Sermon on Mark 10:35-45

Pastor Jennifer Garcia

Last month, we talked about this pattern in the Gospel of Mark where three times, Jesus predicts his death and resurrection, the disciples misunderstand him, and then he teaches them more about what it means to follow him.

We read two of these passages last month, and this week, we’ve finally reached the third time.

James and John remind me of a time when I was in first or second grade. I was in class, and I had some sort of minor physical ailment (I don’t even remember what it was). But I told my teacher, and she asked if I wanted to go to the office or tough it out.

I didn’t know what “tough it out” meant, but I was proud enough that I wasn’t going to ask. I decided to tell her I would tough it out, thinking maybe it was something that would make me feel better. To my dismay, she went back to the lesson without doing anything to ease my woes.

I learned an uncomfortable lesson that day about pretending I understood something I didn’t.

Similarly, James and John asked Jesus for glory and special treatment, and he replied, “Are you able to drink the cup that I drink or be baptized with the baptism that I am baptized with?” James and John replied in the affirmative, but they obviously didn’t know what they were talking about, and Jesus knew it.

They apparently had not been paying attention to Jesus’ prediction right before this that he would be “handed over to the chief priests and thescribes, and they [would] condemn him to death; then they [would] hand him over to the gentiles; they [would] mock him and spit upon him and flog him and kill him, and after three days he [would] rise again.”

That’s not a cup James and John, with their daydreams of glory, should have been so excited to drink from. And remember: this was the third time Jesus had told them all of this. But they still weren’t getting it.

And then the other disciples were miffed at James and John for presuming to ask for those positions of status. They obviously missed the point, too, that Jesus was going to suffer and die very soon.

So, Jesus began to teach them what power really means in the Beloved Community.

Our culture today values power and status in a similar way to what James and John were picturing.

We don’t have to look far to hear about or scroll past people striving for power and status:

1.    Celebrities are nothing new, though, it’s an odd phenomenon to have so many people today who are “famous for being famous.”

2.    Other people are making entire careers out of being social media influencers, vying to shape culture and get the attention of brands.

3.    And in a contentious election year, we’re killing countless trees to print the political advertisements that stuff our mailboxes.

So many people spend so much energy to attractpeople’s attention, support, and esteem. And rarely do people consider the cost.

After all, attention is fickle—a household name one day is forgotten the next, political careers come and go.

If the goal is so dependent on others’ opinions, what happens to one’s sense of self when the attention diminishes?

The Church too in the US is grieving its loss of influence in society. Many of you remember the heyday of the Church in the US in the 20th century.

It was a time when church was the center of community, when business connections wanted to know what church you attended, when Sunday school rooms overflowed, and youth groups thrived.

Christianity was people’s assumed religion, and a Norwegian-Swedish Lutheran couple was considered a “mixed marriage.”

The Church in the US today is not what many people had picturedthe future would look like 50, 60, or 70 years ago.

So, many Christians have gotten caught up in the power struggle, striving for political power, demeaning anything in popular culture that’s getting more attention than church, denigrating younger generations for not attending church or taking over the committee roles their parents and grandparents held, or doubling down onworldviews that are exclusionary and ungenerous.

Too many of us, in trying to resist culture, have actually fallen prey to the same values and tactics so many people use to try to acquire power and status.

Brene Brown calls this “power over.”[1] She describes this approach to power as being driven by fear. People who wield “power over,”

1.    Believe that power is finite and use fear to protect and hoard power.

2.    See decency as a sign of weakness—something “for suckers.”

3.    Believe that being right is more important than getting it right.

4.    Give people someone to blame for their discomfort—preferably someone who looks/acts/sounds different than they do.

5.    Maintain power over by shaming and bullying.

Our society rewards “power over.” It’s even seen as necessary in business or politics or media.

It sounds a lot like what James and John were asking for. They were afraid they weren’t going to have the positions of status they wanted, so they went over the other disciples’ heads to vie for power directly from their rabbi. They expected Jesus to be a “power over” sort of messiah.

But that’s not who Jesus was.

He used this opportunity to teach his disciples a different form of power: the power of service.

Instead of clawing their way to the top, stepping on others to get what they want, Jesus taught his followers to follow in his example of service. In the Beloved Community he was instituting, power is inverted: “whoever wishes to become great among you must be your servant.”

 

Brene Brown also describes a form of power other than “power over”: she calls it “power with/to/within.”

Leaders who work from a position of “power with/to/within”:

1.    Believe that power becomes infinite and expands when shared with others.

2.    They value decency as a function of self-respect and respect for others.

3.    Create learning cultures. Getting it right is more important than being right.

4.    Normalize discomfort and move away from shame and blame and toward accountability and meaningful change.

5.    Frame leadership as a responsibility to be in service of others rather than served by others.

This type of power isn’t easy. It’s against the grain of the human instinct toward “power over.” Jesus came to teach us a different way, and he died for it.

But fortunately, that’s not the end of the story, and the upside down Beloved Community will be complete one day, where the last will be first and the first will be last.

Until then, we too can follow Jesus’ example of greatness through service. It’s not easy, and there’s plenty in our culture that resists it.

But we have the Holy Spirit within us to guide us, and we have each other to encourage us along the way.

This congregation has a spirit of service—it’s our mission and purpose to feed our neighbors, body and soul.

And I’ve experienced your humility and servants’ hearts. A while back, the stewardship team led a project where we collected acts of kindness. We encouraged you all to write down the acts of kindness you did throughout the month.

But even though I witness your kindness all the time—watching out for each other, showing generosity to the community—I had a couple people pull me aside and tell me how uncomfortable it made them to have to write down their acts of kindness. The slips of paper were even anonymous, but you were too humble to even write down that you held a door for someone.

It's beautiful, and I love that about you. You care about other people so much and want to serve and don’t want to be acknowledged.

So, as the stewardship team is collecting stories about this congregation for our Stories of Us project, you don’t have to write anything about yourself. But maybe this week, write down a way you’ve seen others in this congregation serve the community.

It’s okay to brag about each other’s kindness. Let’s remind each other of how much this congregation strives to serve.

That’s a way we can remember to follow in Jesus’ example of servanthood instead of the world’s “power over.”

Let’s continue this congregation’s legacy of service as we serve our community and all our beloved neighbors together.


[1]https://brenebrown.com/resources/brene-brown-on-power-and-leadership/

Sermon on Mark 10:17-31

Pastor Jennifer Garcia

It’s been said that the job of the newspaper is to comfort the afflicted and afflict the comfortable. The same might be said about our Gospel reading today.

To people neglected by society, Jesus’ promise that the first will be last and the last will be first is good news. His promise of a hundredfold of everything sacrificed for the sake of following him is a relief.

To people with a lot of possessions and power, “the first will be last and the last will be first” sounds more like a threat. And the promise of a hundredfoldseems like sorry compensation for having to give up everything first.

I find this story more afflicting than comforting, and probably a lot of you feel the same.

Most of us don’t consider ourselves rich, but when 700 million people around the world live on less than $2.15 a day, it puts things in perspective. We don’t have to be billionaires to identify with the man who approached Jesus and went away grieving.

His story startedpromisingly. Instead of the religious leaders who were always trying to trap Jesus, this man approached him and knelt down—like the stories throughout the Gospel of Mark when people ask Jesus for healing.He came to Jesus with humility and hope.

His question seems earnest—“what must I do to inherit eternal life?” and Jesus answered in his trademark indirect way: you know the commandments.

The man’s claim that he had kept all the commandments might sound pompous to us, but Jesus didn’t seem to disagree with him. It even says that Jesus looked at him and loved him. He just gave him one final task: sell everything you have, give the proceeds to the poor, and follow him.

The man “was shocked and went away grieving, for he had many possessions.” He came to Jesus for healing but wasn’t willing to go through with the treatment.

Then, the disciples seemed anxious about the implications of Jesus’ words. In their culture, riches were indications of God’s favor and blessing (which is not so different from our own culture), so if this rich man couldn’t enter the kingdom of God, how could someone with presumably less of God’s favor enter it?

So, the disciples started to remind Jesus that they had given up everything to follow him, and that makes them okay in God’s eyes, right? Right?!

Jesus reassured them that anyone who sacrificed relationships, status, property, possessions, etc. for the sake of following Jesus would receive a hundredfold “in this age” and eternal life to come.

That’s not super reassuring today, when I have a garage in need of organizing and a retirement account and have never had to wonder where my next meal will come from.

Preachers often try to soften this text, doing theological gymnastics to try to let us off the hook.

Someone in the 9th century made up a story that there was a small gate in Jerusalem called “the eye of the needle” that a camel couldn’t go through unless it was unburdened.[1]

Other people say Jesus knew this man had a particular vice of greed that needed to be addressed in this way, but that the same prescription doesn’t apply to us.

I think that’s letting us off too easily.

Why would Jesus declare that it’s so hard for people with wealth to enter the kingdom of God if he were just talking about that one person?

Why wouldn’t that apply to those of us who live at least relatively comfortably in one of the wealthiest countries in the world?

If we don’t need healing in the same way this man did, why does this story bother us so much?

In various places around the world, people use simple traps to catch monkeys. They get a jar or a gourd with a small opening big enough for a monkey’s paw to get through. Then they put some food inside. When the monkey reaches in and grabs the food, the opening is too small to let the paw and the food through. The monkey would have to let go of the food to get free, but it’s unwilling to let go.

The monkey seems silly for not letting go, but then I read this Gospel story, look around at my many possessions, and realize I’m not so different.

My stuff weighs me down. It can be a burden. I am in need of healing.

I’ve been fascinated by minimalism for many years. I crave the simplicity and the peace that seems to come with having less stuff.

From Marie Kondo to tiny homes to capsule wardrobes, minimalism has been having a moment in US culture.

But minimalism for its own sake is not what Jesus is talking about in our Gospel reading.

Getting rid of things so that you can brag about how little you have can make minimalism an idol.

Striving for less so that you can feel like you’re enough is still trying to earn salvation by works.

As much as Jesus gives tangible instructions in this week’s story, works are not what saves us. Jesus saved us in his death and resurrection. It’s already done. Salvation is about God’s work, not ours. We rely purely on God’s grace, and that is enough. As Jesus said, “for God, all things are possible.”

So, when Jesus talks about entering the kingdom of God, he’s not talking about getting in the gates of heaven. Christianity has focused so much on heaven that we forget the kingdom of God is here now, too.

Jesus came to usher in the Reign of God on Earth. He collected disciples to form a community in the present that would carry God’s love and care into the world.

Jesus wasn’t talking about how hard it is for rich people to get through the pearly gates; he was talking about how hard it is for people with a lot of possessions to be willing to give all that up to be part of the Beloved Community here and now, even though they would get so much more out of it than they put in.

When we cling to our possessions, we’re like the monkey with its paw in the trap. If we let go, we are free. But it’s so hard to let go.

But Jesus was inviting the man to sell what he had and give the money to the poor. It wasn’t just about letting go of what he had. It was for the sake of his neighbors’ flourishing. It was about becoming part of a community of mutual support and love.

That is the “hundredfold now in this age—houses, brothers and sisters, mothers and children, and fields.” Jesus also mentions persecutions, because this community is not how the world works. Indeed, early Jesus followers were persecuted by the Roman Empire. They were willing to die for the community Jesus instituted. Jesus took care of salvation, but their sacrifice was to live fully now. That is what Jesus’ invitation is about.

It's Jesus’ invitation to us, too. As much as we want to be let off the hook for this costly instruction, it’s not about our salvation but about our freedom to love our neighbor and live an abundant life in community now.

Every big change starts with a small step. Today, let’s remember the values we share as a community. This congregation has a rich and lengthy history.

It’s a generous community dedicated to service. Some of you have lived your whole life in this congregation. Some of us have spent much less time here. Regardless, you are each an important part of this community, and your stories are important.

Our stewardship team is inviting all of us to share our memories of this congregation. You can share them on these slips of paper or email them to Terri Robertson, and we will be collecting them and sharing them in November.

You can share any memories you like and as many as you like. In honor of today’s Gospel story, though, perhaps think of a memory of this congregation’s generosity.

How have you experienced the generosity of this congregation?

How has generosity formed this congregation’s identity?

When we remember our history together, it’s easier to live out our values.

As hard as Jesus’ instructions are, they lead to community. We’re not alone. We have each other, brought together by the Holy Spirit in this place and time with many decades of history in and care for the community.

As we remember that history and this congregation’s values, let’s let the Holy Spirit work in us to help us let go of what is keeping us trapped.

There is freedom in God and abundance in the Beloved Community for all of us.


[1]https://www.workingpreacher.org/commentaries/revised-common-lectionary/ordinary-28-2/commentary-on-mark-1017-31-4

Sermon on Mark 10:2-16

Pastor Jennifer Garcia

Our Gospel reading today is hard.

All of us either are or know someone—probably many people—who are divorced.

Sometimes divorce saves people’s lives—sometimes figuratively, sometimes literally.

Divorce is hard, even under the best circumstances.

Sometimes people who have divorced have later married other people who light up their life.

Divorce can be very painful, not just for the couple, but for their children, other family members, and friends. And sometimes it’s still the most compassionate option. And sometimes it’s not.

There are as many reasons for divorce as there are people who have experienced it.

Divorce is complicated.

We have rituals around what to do when a spouse dies. We bring casseroles, send flowers and cards, show up with groceries or take-out, we surround the bereaved with love at the funeral.

We don’t have rituals around divorce, though it’s also a painful and life-changing experience. There’s grief involved, even in the best of circumstances, because even good change is hard. And it’s not always good change.

Too many people have been hurt by this Gospel reading. Too many people have seen it as an outright condemnation of divorce regardless of circumstances. Too many people have been encouraged by their clergy to remain in abusive marriages.

This is a tough reading. We’re going to dig deeper, and I want to encourage you to be kind to yourself today, because divorce can be such a painful subject.

Let’s start off by noticing that the story begins by saying that some Pharisees were trying to test Jesus. That changes how we look at the teaching, because Jesus didn’t independently decide that divorce was an essential topic to instruct his disciples and followers about.

So, what was the test? It could have simply been a controversial topic that would likely get Jesus in trouble no matter how he answered.

There also could be a political reason why it would have gotten Jesus in trouble. The only other time divorce is mentioned in the Gospel of Mark is in chapter 6, when it talks about King Herod and his marriage to his brother Philip’s wife, Herodias. John the Baptist had spoken publicly about this being unlawful, which got him killed. Perhaps the Pharisees were hoping the same thing would happen to Jesus.

But instead of giving them a clear yes or no answer, Jesus pointed them to Moses and had them confirm that the Law permits divorce.

Instead of letting that be the end of the conversation, though, Jesus pointed them back further—all the way to the first humans in our reading from Genesis today.

As Jesus often did, he took the Law and interpreted it in a way that gotpast the letter of the Law to its heart.

God created a second human because it wasn’t good for the first human to be alone. We were created for community and with a need for community.

Jesus warned that the Law permits divorce because of humanity’s “hardness of heart.” Ideally, marriages would last, and divorce wouldn’t be needed, because we wouldn’t hurt or betray or neglect each other.

But part of being human on this side of life is that we fall short, we miss the mark, and we hurt each other and ourselves.That can be incredibly painful, but God is with us every step of the way, holding us, weeping with us. God loves each of us the way we should be loved, even when we don’t get that love from other human beings.

Jesus’ disciples still seem concerned about the topic of divorce, though, so they talked to Jesus about it later.

This time, he spoke more directly. He outright said that people who divorce their spouses and then remarry commit adultery against their first spouse.

Again, this is tough.

Just because someone’s marriage didn’t work out the first time doesn’t mean they should be barred from another chance at love and the promises of marriage.

Let’s look at a couple things this could mean:

First, let’s remember that marriage in the first century was not the same as it is now. It was an economic agreement, a marker of status, and a way to continue one’s family line. It was not a bond of romantic love as it’s usually considered in the US today.

Women and children were the property of their husbands and fathers. There’s disagreement among scholars about whether Jewish women in the first century could even initiate divorce. Roman culture seems to have been a bit more egalitarian in that regard.

It’s interesting that Jesus specifically namedmen who divorce their wives and women who divorce their husbands in this passage. Perhaps it was a dig at Herodias, as we talked about earlier. Perhaps it was a way to show the inequity of the law.

Though even if women were allowed to divorce their husbands, it would have been hard for them to survive on their own. Society was structured in a way that made women dependent on men for resources and social standing.

As we talked about a couple weeks ago, there’s a reason why the Hebrew Bible repeatedly instructs God’s people to care for widows and orphans—they were the least protected by society because they didn’t have the support and protection of men.

Divorce was hard on women in the first century in different ways than divorce is hard today, though certainly it can still be an economic hardship and have social consequences.

 

Lest you think I’m completely ignoring the second part of our Gospel reading today,which is a whole additional story, let’s take a look at it too and how it relates to the first story.

People were bringing kids to see Jesus, and the disciples were shooing them away. Jesus scolded his disciples and kept spending time with the kids.

Even though the two stories don’t seem related, they both involve vulnerable people.

Jesus essentially told the Pharisees that even if the Law permitted it, men shouldn’t divorce their wives for insignificant reasons, because it would leave the women without their social and financial support system.

And then, he told his disciples that the Beloved Community belongs to people like children—vulnerable, without social standing, completely dependent on others.

God created humanity to be in relationship—not just romantic partnership, but community with other people and with God.

Jesus came to spread the Beloved Community, which focuses on those society forgets about—those without a social and financial support system, those who are vulnerable and who need community to survive and thrive.

Jesus didn’t tell the Pharisees that Moses was wrong and divorce shouldn’t be lawful. It was more like, “Why are we even discussing the exact letter of the law about this? We should instead be building a community where everyone is loved and supported and cared for.”

As painful as our reading today is and as much as it’s been used to keep people in abusive and life-draining marriages, divorce isn’t even really the bottom line.

As is so often the case, Jesus’ teachings consistently come back to caring for the vulnerable, building community, and loving one another.

We can look at Genesis and see that God intended for humanity to care as deeply for each other as we do our own bodies.

We can look at the Law and see that God knew we would fall short of that ideal.

And then we can look at the Gospel of Mark and see that Jesus wanted his followers to strive for that ideal to the extent of our ability, not just for spouses but for our extended community, especially for the most vulnerable. And everyone is invited into that community. All people are bone of our bones and flesh of our flesh.

That is the Beloved Community on Earth.Be at peace, Beloved, and love one another.